06-08-2006, 07:36 PM
Yes, QM thinks that it is clone, and it is true in most cases.
Often you also clone cloned macros. What is better?
1. Macro -> Macro2 -> Macro22 -> Macro222 -> ...
2. Macro -> Macro2 -> Macro3 -> Macro4 -> ...
Sometimes is better 1, sometimes 2.
QM uses variant 2. If, when cloning Macro4, Macro does not exist, then the clone is named Macro. Or, if Macro exists but Macro2 not, the clone is named Macro2.
Often you also clone cloned macros. What is better?
1. Macro -> Macro2 -> Macro22 -> Macro222 -> ...
2. Macro -> Macro2 -> Macro3 -> Macro4 -> ...
Sometimes is better 1, sometimes 2.
QM uses variant 2. If, when cloning Macro4, Macro does not exist, then the clone is named Macro. Or, if Macro exists but Macro2 not, the clone is named Macro2.
